Thursday, September 22, 2011

NPR and the execution of Troy Davis

In class today, we discussed the high-profile death penalty case in Georgia. Troy Davis, convicted for killing an off-duty police officer in 1989, was put to death by lethal injection late last night after the last of his appeals had been denied by the United States Supreme Court.

Normally, a death penalty case would have marginal relevance to media law class, but it certainly reminds me of Chapter 1, which discusses the American legal system. Indeed, the death penalty represents, perhaps, the strongest expression of government power over the individual -- the ability to put a citizen to death for certain crimes.

But my interest, in particular, is what unfolded last night as I followed media coverage of the case. CNN and other news outlets were reporting live from the scene outside the prison where Davis was scheduled to be executed. Dozens and dozens of law enforcement officials, many in full riot gear, stood guard in front of the prison entrance. Across the street, demonstrators and Troy Davis supporters chanted, sang and peacefully gathered.

I had just gotten home shortly after 6 p.m. Central Time yesterday evening. I checked my iPhone and turned on CNN, which reported that the U.S. Supreme Court had agreed to consider a last-minute appeal from Davis' lawyers. This meant that the execution was being delayed until the high court ruled on this appeal.

Meanwhile, I checked the National Public Radio app on my iPhone and saw this, at 6:25 p.m. Central Time:


At this time, NPR reported that Davis had been executed.

Confused, I checked other media outlets, and I kept checking the NPR app on my iPhone.

Even 41 minutes after that story version had been updated, I still saw NPR reporting that Davis had been executed:
I even posted on my Twitter account, asking why NPR News was reporting that Davis had been executed, when it was clear that was untrue (please excuse the misspelling of Davis' first name).
It wasn't until 6:49 p.m. Central Time that NPR updated the story on the app to reflect that Davis was still alive and that the court was considering a late appeal.

As you may know, the Supreme Court denied Davis' last appeal about three hours later and Davis was pronounced dead at 10:08 p.m. Central Time.

Though I tagged NPR News in my tweets, I've yet to hear why this happened. I suspect I know what happened. I figure the news story reporting on Davis' execution was in the queue and ready to go. Shortly after 6 p.m. Eastern Time, it was posted. But not verifying the information was a significant mistake. 

I understand. Mistakes happen. But how long should it take to correct the mistake? Is it unreasonable to expect NPR to correct the mistake as soon as possible? Is 40 minutes too long a period of time to consider reasonable? I think so. If it was corrected with 10 or 15 minutes, I would be more understanding.

But for at least 43 minutes, and potentially as long as 47 minutes since the last time the story was updated at 7:02 p.m. Eastern Time, NPR was still reporting that Davis was dead, when it was clearly not true.

I expect more from a media outlet such as NPR. I'd be interested in hearing an explanation as to why this happened. I've not seen any media criticism about this, but I cannot be the only person in the world to have noticed this last night, could I?

If you'd like to comment about NPR's coverage, or if you'd like to comment on the Davis execution, please do so in the comments.

Monday, September 5, 2011

New laws take effect

First, a note about the wildfires all around Central Texas: I hope you and your loved ones are safe. Combined with the extreme heat of late and the ongoing and worsening drought, the wildfires make for tough conditions in Central Texas.

Many news organizations are providing good information about a wide-range of issues, including lists of shelters, care providers and weather conditions. Best wishes to everyone to remain safe and careful.

Meanwhile, you may have noticed that we have reached the month of September. As of Sept. 1, new laws passed by the state legislature and the governor have gone into effect, while some have been challenged.

Read this news story by the Associated Press (via the Austin American-Statesman) to review some of the new laws. Click here to go to the news story.

After reading the story, return here and post a comment to give your reaction. Which law did you find most interesting? Why? Or, if you'd like, you can comment on a new law you find most useful, or useless. Take your pick.